There was a time when ONLY landlords of House of Multiple Occupation HMOs required a license to let their property, while the rest of us were spared. But that was back when we were living blissfully in ignorance. Yes, so if we all rally together and purchase landlord licenses, we should see a decline in antisocial behavior. That will be fucking hilarious.

Another day at the office: Having fun while reducing the deficit we created! The Act came into force in April Selective licensing is intended to address the impact of poor quality private landlords and reduce levels of antisocial behaviour. It was primarily introduced to tackle problems in areas of low housing demand in mind— although the Act also allows for selective licensing in some other circumstances.

Failing to do so could result in heavy-handed penalties. Like I said, someone is getting very rich from this cashcow. Usually the person who is in control of the property the person who receives the rent makes the application and is the licence holder. This could be the owner or landlord, however it could also be a manager employed by the owner. Once an application is submitted, it must be processed to determine whether or not you will be granted a licence.

So in practise, yes, you could get rejected. Each borough will have their own set of conditions, which the landlord must meet in order to be granted a license.

Landlords are also expected to stick to certain conditions once the license is granted. There are also certain mandatory conditions which need to be addressed, which include the following:. Again, the conditions may depend on the district your property falls under. I update the list as and when I can- usually after someone leaves a comment or emails me directly with an update.

If you wish to find out accurate information regarding a particular borough, you should either look on their website, or contact them directly. If you are a self-managed landlord e. More details on both over at the Rent Smart website.

Yes, the scheme was scrapped! Phewwww, close call from being totally ass-raped. If you care enough, you should definitely follow suit and fight the good fight. Most Boroughs will have a petition scheme available. All I see right now is a couple of punks in suits, jacking me in the middle of the day.

If anything, I believe it will have an adverse affect on the overall industry. Let me explain why…. Ok, so they expect the landlords that are ALREADY providing poorly conditioned properties and neglecting their obligations to suddenly pay attention to this new legislation. If a landlord genuinely participates in foul-play, there are laws already in place to enforce prosecution.

All this is going to do is add an extra penalty on already prosecutable offenses. Do they really expect a high level of service? I have no idea what statistical information was crunched in order to swing that conclusion, but I fail to fathom the correlation.

Before we know it, graffiti on the wall will trigger off code red alerts, and obviously the best way to put that fire out is with a landlord license. This is about raising standards, and making those accountable that fail to meet those standards.

Landlords are already required to ensure gas and electrics are safe, they are also required to ensure heating and water systems are in proper working order, and to generally provide a safe living environment. This will affect the entire chain, not just the landlord. Invitation for other fees: But besides from that, consider the following…. The main problem associated with poor living conditions and acceptance of those conditions is ignorance. Will I go and research it when I finish writing this blog?

Would I listen if someone made an effort to educate me? The common misconception is that landlords hold all the power, with the ability to force tenants into homelessness at the drop of a hat, which of course is completely untrue.

All these issues point to one fundamental issue: We need more people to be aware of what already exists. If the powers that be want to make a real positive impact, they need to cut the bullshit and tackle the underlying issues. Despite my futile ramblings, it is a legal obligation, so if it applies, buy the damn license. So, what are your thoughts? Have any of you been subject to the licenses?

Also, once again, if anyone has any additional information on licensing zones, please let me know! I'm just a simple landlord blogger, I am not qualified to give legal advice. Any advice I give is my opinion based on my experience. I will always recommend you seek legal or professional advice on any legal matters! Then maybe you should sign up to my FREE newsletter so you receive more like it! I think this is only a money making scheme for the councils as the government has cut lots of their funds.

Once everything is fully settled they are guaranteed to have a massive source of income every 5 years which they can use to cover most of their inefficiencies and incompetence. There is no point everyone telling there miseries on this site if no actions are taken. In my opinion, all landlords must create like a union or join Letting associations like RLA etc.

There is no need for the council to get involve in this. Today the government has started with the higher rate tax payer, you never know in future years they can extend this to anyone having a BTL property.

Imagine what may happen if interest rate goes up and you still have to pay the income tax. PLEASE THINK CAREFULLY ON THIS. WE MUST HAVE A UNION OF LANDLORDS. I know this is a somewhat controversial view among landlords, but I would much rather have the Welsh style licensing scheme in England provided it wasn't managed by town hall "Jordans"than the system we currently have where every little town hall Hitler can freely impose whatever rules and charges they see fit, after getting away with "consultations" that are barely legal.

I have since sold my Salford property since my tenant died This whole business priced me out, and I only wanted it as another way to help me in my old age instead of relying on deflating pension pots!! If you are just someone trying to get on a bit in life, then I feel sorry for you, especially if you get a bad tenant, as the licensing thing will make it a nightmare for the landlord Its a money printing scheme, which hits the people trying hardest to do the right thing- others are still getting away with things.

I have property in Newham and am about to register. There are some shocking properties in Newham that you can plainly see even from the outside that they are substandard.

There are landlords who will avoid all legal requirements and break every law in the book with out any remorse and be proud to do it. Councils will visit and give 28 days to make repairs and alterations and obtain licenses even when the property has no smoke alarms, dodgy wiring, leaking pipes, damp, 10 people per room, illegal immigrants and so on. He is then served a notice and another few weeks go by. Meanwhile he is collecting thousands in rent.

I would like to see the councils confiscate all rental income and compulsory purchase these properties to sell them and raise the funds needed to run the scheme in this way. Compliant landlords should then be offered discounts for playing by the rules.

I think this would justify the charge. All that is happening now is us honest landlords who have a concious are paying for these scum landlords to get rich.

I had my properties inspected what a joke Inspector said I must have extractor fans in the kitchen or cooker hoods, my property is 14yr old the extractor fans were built in when the property's were built they were passed by building regulation officer.

I must not forget steps to front external doors must have handrails these steps are only mm high bear in mind these were passed by building regs nit picking councils had the powers to do what they are doing now. I fail to see what cooker extractor hoods have to do with health and safety - cooker hoods have little effect on preventing condensation.

A cooker hood is simply an add on, a nicety to stop cooking smells lingering and possibly bothering neighbours in adjoining properties. The only safety argument I can think of for a cooking extractor fan was when I once had downstairs neighbours also owner occupiers who cooked exceptionally pungent food nearly every day for 18 months and the fumes were constantly saturating my flat - they wouldn't fit an extractor hood and in the end I nearly killed the b'stards!!

Answer to Suna Housing associations do not pay this like the council they do not They go by their own rules In selective licence they have to have so many wall sockets in a room but the council do not go by this rule.

If a garden gate is broken with a council tenant they tell them to fix it themselves or replace it, if that was private landlord they would be all over us like a rash Do as I say do not do as I do attitude. Moe - exactly, it's do as I say, not as I do. I've seen council properties so badly maintained that if they were rented out by a private landlord those properties would be put under a maintenance order I'm talking damp, bad windows, broken kitchens etc.

For goodness sake this was not my fault but the fault of the tenant. My properties are only 15years old, god help these landlords with yr old terrace properties, we might as well send in bulldozers it would be cheaper!!!!

Cash Maker

Then we will be called for having high rents. Friends out there what do you think? We have now had several reports on this thread from landlords who have taken exception to assessments made by local authority licensing officers.

ТУКОФИТОМОЛ ( противоопухолевая мазь), 25 г. - Продажа, доставка БАД, Флоралид, Нуксен, Гемобин. ТианДе.

Some have been clearly incorrect, even outrageous, such as the assertion made to Diamond that the tenant's nephew regularly staying weekends was turning the place into an HMO! As Loose Minute has stated, all safety assessments should be carried out with reference to HHSRS Part 1 of the Housing Actbut this legislation is not clear cut, but is designed to deal with each property and its occupants on an individual basis.

This also means taking into account how vulnerable the occupants of the property are for example, a young child or a frail elderly person will require a safer, more adapted environment than a healthy 25 year old. For example, where HMOs which come under slightly separate licensing legislation are concerned, council officials will impose safety adaptations based on the particular structure of the property, and no two will be the same.

For example, one house might have windows that can be used as fire escapes, and the one next door may not, so the first house requires less adaptation than the second. RPT did not know of this I have put a complaint to my mp, even gone as far as writing to Brandon Lewis. He just does not get it re: I think his job has gone to his head, he should not be like this at the end of the day he is a public servant not only for the tenant but for everyone if this selective license is going to work!

When doing his inspection he never checked the smoke alarms, the water taps to make sure there was hot water,central heating,electric lights, flushing wc's.

Thanks for sharing that further, Moe! You must be incredibly irritated and frustrated. It's hard enough having that kind of criticism levelled at you when it's informed and justified, but when it's not What do his bosses have to say about all this i. Does Environmental Health agree? I'd be inclined to email or write to the officer, ensuring you copy his superiors in. Give him the link or a copy of this http: Anthony Gold Solicitors are one of the leading legal authorities on housing law.

The blog I've linked to is by Timothy Waitt, who has successfully prosecuted many landlords in cases involving damp and mould. Even he is saying the tenant has some responsibility to take reasonable measures to prevent condensation and mould, unless this is related to a specific disrepair issue. You might also want to send him something about how UPVC windows are constructed, although that might be a little too obvious, even for him I Tweeted this thread and London Property Licensing suggested contacting an independent environmental health officer - this might be a good place to start: I've also done some Googling and found this http: Following your account and others on here, I'm about to send the same to LA my properties fall under.

However, you'll find each council is the new york stock exchange open on columbus day different and I've no doubt some will be more professional in their approach than others.

My flat is up for sale. Is there any way I can recoup the fee? The authority may require the application to be accompanied by a fee fixed by the authority, and when fixing the fee the authority may take into account all costs incurred by the authority in carrying out their functions under this part. The functions covered include processing the application and issuing the licence, which currency derivative market india already been done in this case.

A local authority must refund the applicant in full any fee which he has paid in respect of an application as soon as reasonably practical after it learns that at the time the fee was paid the house was not a house that was required to be licensed under Part 2 or Part 3 of the Housing Act At the time you made your application and paid the fee, the property did require a licence, so there is no obligation for the Council refund the cost.

Regardless if the license is issued electronically or on paper, it is the processing which you paid for, which has been completed. The duration the license was kept for does not affect this. To confirm, the Council are not in a position to refund the fee for your licence application or provide a rebate of part of the fee as this is non-refundable and non-transferable.

As call forward android 4.2.1 stated, this is set out in our FAQs on the Council website. I am sorry this is not the answer you were hoping for on this occasion, however I hope I have explained the justifications for the decision.

I know it is unlikely that I will ever see that money again, but if anyone has some good advice I would gladly take it. Assume that would cost me more than the returned fee if it ever was refunded. The European Court of Justice ruling on Hemmings V Westminster is due some time this month. When this case was heard in the Supreme Court, it could not be decided whether charging the whole fee upfront was in violation of the service directive, so they referred it up to the ECJ for judgment on this aspect.

If the ECJ rules that charging upfront is unlawful, there will be forex trading technical system reviews implications for landlord licensing fees, especially where an applicant can demonstrate hardship caused by payment for example, they had to borrow the money.

If however, you still need legal advice, Cotswold Barristers do a free 15 minute consultation over the phone. While some turnover of landlords is to be expected, most would be expected to hold on to their properties and continue to rent out.

So, you do wonder a.

Someone made a freedom of information request to Croydon Council about the selective landlord licensing scheme in April. This was the very generalised and non specific response she got about the fee structure:. The fee was determined forex swap example using the estimated number of privately rented properties in the borough, and the amount of work and therefore staff required to process the applications and carry out inspections.

Under the Housing Act we may charge a licence fee to cover the cost of this work but may not make a profit, nor use fee income to fund other, non-related areas of work. The scheme stock market in ethiopia pdf be self-financing.

Yet in a letter dated 22 Aprilin response to Annie Kerr's freedom of information request, the council state:. Yet another incident of the right hand not knowing what the left handelszeiten forex weihnachten 2014 is doing, and Croydon staff being ignorant of fundamental facts about their own employer's licensing scheme.

Helen Doxford Harris » Missing People

The FOI letter can be downloaded here: Maglet - I'll be interested in seeing their response, though I daresay it'll be something very non committal. When setting the amount of the fee everything was taken into consideration and the lowest possible fee set at that time. We accept that not all cases will be dealt with in the same way. A small number of cases may not need an inspection, however many more cases will need far more time to process than merely issuing the licence, and the cost mechcad acemoney v3.9 keymaker set to reflect this.

I appreciate that you are not happy with the situation, however your application has been processed and as previously mentioned we are not able to issue a refund. Might be worth doing another FOI request to Croydon and asking them how much they charge for an inspection of a single occupation property for landlord licensing purposes So, if I got a penny of my fee back it would be a miracle.

The councils are supported by an overarching decision made by whom, I wouldn't know which covers every council's licensing policy. Not sure one person's objection is going to make any difference. Would an FOI enquiry allow me to know how much had been accrued from landlords, and how much has been spent on tackling the problematic pr non-fee paying ones? In anticipation of the Hemmings V Westminster verdict, a FOI request has been sent asking what proportion of the fee currently goes on enforcement and their projection for the remaining years each licence will run for - I will update on here when we get their response.

For anyone interested in Croydon's expenditure in general, their current accounts can found at https: Other accounts are shown as markedly in the red I have been complaining about my property's inspection by selective license official The report was more a jobs worth report My properties are 16 yr old I told them I will not have hand rails fitted to the front door step as the step is only 7inch high After finding out the inspector was measuring from flag stone to threshold instead of flag stone to 7inch step then from the baby forex trading to threshold, it would have been impossible to stride into the property the way they were measuring it,never mind it being dangerous.

This would be extra cost to me having the hand rails fitted when not needed,if the costs keep going up this will have to be passed on to the tenants. I was told by building regulations that a officer from selective licence had contacted them regarding the said steps asking if they agreed with them, the building regulations officer stated no as far as they were concerned the steps were within there findings.

Even up to last week the selective licence office are still sending me letters re: I even looked at properties to let out of the selective licence area's of How much money does pat robertson make, I found 6 properties that are not within the selective license rules re: I think because I disagreed with their report they are putting pressure on me. One to make you laugh in the report I was told to put PUTTY in a double glazed window, who would ever believe it but I have it in writing.

Do you think this was illegal? That the process had not been done correctly by the council as the government wanted before their application was applied.

I am going to write to the CEO why there has been no discrimination between buy-to-let and private landlords in the application form. I am interested in the Hemmings vs Broker de forex en chile case re.

Does anyone have an update on this? According to Cornerstones, the barristers acting for Hemmings, the European Court CJEU judgement on Hemmings V Westminister won't be issued until this later this year. Their blog can be followed here: I suspect Cornerstones will be amongst the first to new zealand forex traders the news on this, so worth adsense money makers back from time to time.

I looked into a refund if the licensed property was sold or would it be transferred to a purchaser. Answer to this from Rotherham Council was NO refund also anyone purchasing the property with intention to let would be charged for another license. This practice is wrong in any sense of the word.

This means they are getting double for a single property, as I was told it is not the landlord that is licensed it is the property. No wonder we were told to inform the council if we intend selling the property, this is not so we can have a refund!!!!!

Up in Wirral us good landlords with decent tenants are blighted by rogues who have decimated property with bad managent and bad tenants. I was livid at the idea of having to pay for licences but, and I hate to say it, existing legislation doesn't really help in cleaning up the kerb appeal in these areas.

I have seen improvements already in that the council lackeys are getting landlords to fit gates, paint the fronts, put windows back in were the ASBO tenants had smashed them. They also have been helping tenants get help with fuel debt, addictions, and all sorts of stuff like new boilers and wall insulation schemes. Our bad colleagues are letting us down, I only hope the cash I've spent on the scheme will help to drive the bstards out of business so I can one day see a bit o growth in the area and cash out myself.

This scheme is another money maker and it's alternative method of Peterborough being able to patch up their finances. The reasoning for this license makes no sense to me whatsoever and how is that payment bollinger bands explain to improve on the attitude of unscrupulous landlords and anti social behaviour or the high level of migration?

Make money website flipping criteria is a joke because Peterborough has lkp forex limited history attracted Italians, Pakistanis, West Indians, Polish to name a few! The joke is when guessing at how binary options strategy which will rate look at the map of proposed rentals which fall under the scheme, rentals in the more affluent parts of Peterborough are untouched on the right side of the train cash maker cliftonville margate. Now how does that work?

If Peterborough council is going to charge some areas and not others is that legal? If the scheme is going to be enforced, then every single landlord should have to put their hands in their pockets and pay because their property is situated in the borough. Interesting how this council has targeted the "bad" parts but it makes no sense.

It sounds as if the poor are being penalised yet again. The joke is some landlords may choose to increase their rentals to cover the cost of having to comply and who is it going to affect in the end? I remember when I was renovating my property and the money makes the world go round bible was extensive but upon completion I received a call from Peterborough council cash maker cliftonville margate that they be allowed to inspect the property 1929 collapse stock market crash caused the great depression at the time was empty as I worked on finding a good letting agent.

An inspector wanted to get into the property to establish if there were foreigners stock broker jobs seattle there. Now I was also paying the full amount of council tax, no exemptions and she was demanding to get into the property and forcing me to have to let the property out to people on her books.

Naturally being me, I told ge money bank amazon payment address that she was not going to be allowed in the house for whatever reason.

My course of action was to australian beef stock market the council who sent around another employee to establish there was no one living inside. Now with the above fact, you can imagine that there are going to be, as you have all described people dispersed from the council to pressurise landlords into do doing whatever they want you to do.

This is nothing more than a money making scheme and funnily enough how is the collected revenue going to help cleanse these areas of those people deemed not worthy in society which includes the landlords? This means a landlord has to meet a certain standard before they can legally rent out a property. The above comes from the Peterborough council website and makes me question what qualifies a 'fit and proper person' and what is that 'certain standard'?

Our rental house is in Wales. Because I live in France, I have had to register, sit my examination, I am now waiting to see if I am a fit and proper person, but WAIT I cannot go ahead. I WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITH A LICENCE UNLESS I HAVE AN AGENT, a friend or relative living in the UK who will have to study, pass a commercial agent's exam, and I will have to pay for two Licences.

So I have to pay double everyone else's fees. Rent Smart Wales says unless I do this I cannot rent the house out. Why should I have to pay twice?

I only have 1 rented house? By the way if you have say houses you only need one licence. Please, if you rent a house in Wales get in touch with me, and we can get together and fight this evil. This clause is not in the Housing Wales Actneither is it on Rent Smart Wales' website.

They themselves admit this. If they can impose one condition without legislation, what will they do next? We need to unite and fight. Getting back to Wirral council. As to whether to put your money in property or in the bank, well judging by the number of scam emails etc, stuffed under the bed may be safest!

I am very concerned about the mandatory licensing scheme that Ealing council are intrducing at the end of the year. I am annoyed that it seems to have been introduced in secracy and very fast. Why did I not have the chance to comment? So what exactly do I have to do I wonder to legally avoid this scheme? Perhaps avoid being a private landlord by using some other way of transacting business other than AST. Could I rent to a corporation or does that still leave me as a private landlord?

Could I rent through a corporation? Could I rather than renting, issuue a license to occupy? I am not a lwaer but there must be ways. I would rather not break the law if there is an alternative but might if we could get a large civil disobediance campaign going. I would be very interested in protesting. But I have heard nothing of chanllenge or protest, and nothing of legal circumvention. This is bad legislation, poorly drafted, and I also dont see why Acton should be the guinepigs.

Why should our property be devalued by this, and other areas of Ealing not suffer that blight. I've just learned that Hemmings has been successful in the Supreme Court: I bought the licence as my from my own experience Council Workers are a bunch of morally corrupt not by nature but by profession. Their work practices allows them to do what they like and make decisions that if taken further would not work in their favour. But the costs associated with taking a case further for the service user are excessive which is why the Councils always end up being the winner without the need for neither the judge nor the jury.

The magistrates court sucks anyway. Sorry to be blunt but a system for someone paying for everything and abiding by every law to live quietly does not work out in their favour. I did the basics that were required. The Council writes to them about everything which I disagree with about visiting and about what they wanted me to do, which was just an electric appliance certificate. I did it all and a year later, I've learnt that the tenant has got on to the Council asking them to replace the windows in the back room which has moisture inside.

I'm not sure if this is justifiable. My own windows has moisture inside, early morning and dries out as soon as it mid morning. A local resident of Peterborough here, slap bang in the middle of a street in the Selective Licensing area. Some interesting comments above, especially from Jenni who it appears has property in Peterborough. I wouldn't expect a landlords forum to be pro-licensing obviously, but thought I would offer a residents and non-landlords view, so here goes!

Whilst I don't know how successful the scheme in Peterborough will be - that will depend on the council's available resource to enforce the rules - what I do know is we've seen a slow degradation in our area in the 9 years we've lived here. For reference, we live in an old part of the city with some lovely period property which, in my opinion, is worth preserving.

So in short, we are fans of the scheme! We've seen an increase in anti-social behaviour, crime, poor standards of living and HMO's in recent years. Of course, these social problems can not be laid solely at the feet of rogue landlords, there are some great tenanted properties with good landlords here. However, what we have seen is an increasing number of beautiful period properties being sold off to landlords who subsequently rip them apart and stuff for example five "young professionals" into a 3-bed terrace, all in the name of yield and profit.

Families are moving out, HMO's are moving in and the properties just aren't conducive to this type of conversion. Sadly, there are increasingly more and more bad examples. Opposite the above property, a family is looking to sell after fruitlessly trying to get the landlord to deal with the infestation of bed bugs which have navigated the adjoining loft space into their home.

Add that to the constant string of poor tenants, the latest of which urinates in the garden, and it's easy to see why they've had enough. Lately, we've also had bus loads of property tourists being bussed in by a local firm to take photos of houses for investment purposes, apparently, they are on a course learning to be landlords. Materially, there's nothing wrong with that you'd say, good landlords are as important to the fabric of any area as good owner occupiers, except that's not really what we are getting!

The majority of landlords don't live near their properties, so why should they care about the impact of their actions on our area?

This type of behaviour brings more pressure on parking and services in what are narrow streets, a loss of family homes as layouts change, a deterioration in the fabric of properties, and a loss of a sense of community with a revolving door of tenants.

Do ALL landlords actually think about the impact of their actions on area, truthfully? You'd struggle to convince me otherwise, and before you leap to the defence of your fellow landlords, I worked at a leading property website for 10 years so I know how the market and lettings agents work.

Lately, we've had lots of marketing asking us to sell our property to waiting landlords, apparently one's Mummy wants to buy ours?! Put bluntly, a lot of local residents have had enough so as you can imagine we are looking forward to seeing what the scheme can do. We are also pooling resources to see how we can support the council, having had recent meetings with them to discuss our concerns.

We've nothing against landlords per se, as mentioned above I know how important they are to any area, but there needs to be the right balance and tenants have a basic right to good standard accommodation. If you are a Peterborough landlord doing things properly, surely you've nothing to fear from the scheme other than the cost!

It may or may not succeed, but something needs to be done in our area and as local residents it has our full support.

So, there you go, sorry for the long post but hopefully some reasoned debate from the other side of the argument! As a write this, next door to us is now up for sale and to be honest, we are dreading what might happen. It benefits no one except the councils. Please, please get in touch and with unity we will have strength. You can't pick and choose which laws you must obey.

Not having a landlorzYrd The Rent Smart Wales people npw need to chase up the law-breakers - the unlicensed ones - and start fining them. Otherwise, I want my money back. There is a new even more expensive scheme just entering consultation for the whole of the Nottingham City Council area. There's precious little additional benefit as far as I can see on their site nottinghamcity.

Consultation runs from Jan-March and hardly anyone seems to have even heard about it yet. Claire I update the list as and when I can- usually after someone leaves a comment or emails me directly with an update.

I believe I last updated it a few weeks ago. However, I wouldn't rely on the list to be up-to-date. Liverpool city council licencing have chosen a blanket selective licensing.

No one except the council benefits. So few enforcement officers only pen pushers. Disgusted with it all and so many hundreds of pounds worse off. Notify me via email when someone else leaves a comment on this blog post. I initially started this website because I wanted to document my every step from property idiot to property landlord, in hope that people would find my site and help me along the way.

I literally didn't have a clue about being a landlord when I started this website. Having expanded my property portfolio, I now occassionally blog about my bitter life as a Landlord Feel free to read more about me and my Landlord Blog or contact me directly.

It's important you understand that this is a personal blog, and the aim is to provide the best guides, tips, tools and techniques to being a Landlord gathered by personal experience, so the information is NOT guaranteed to be perfect, and should be used as legal or financial guidance, so do note you use the information at your own risk and I can't accept liability if things go wrong. Please use the links below for more information:. Facebook Twitter Contact About Advice Forum.

THE JEFF BECK BULLETIN ISSUE#3

Next Article Landlord Law: You might also like Right-To-Rent Immigration Checks My Tenant Has Changed The Door Locks, Can He Do that? Bal 3rd April, Mandy Thomson 4th April, The Landlord 4th April, Trixer 4th April, Suna 26th April, Moe 2nd May, Mandy Thomson 2nd May, Moe 11th May, Mandy Thomson 11th May, Moe 12th May, Mandy Thomson 12th May, Maglet 8th July, Mandy Thomson 8th July, Mandy Thomson 9th July, Maglet 9th July, Mandy Thomson 10th July, Maglet 13th July, Mandy Thomson 14th July, Maglet 14th July, Moe 19th July, Bristle 5th August, Mandy Thomson 5th August, Moe 7th August, George 7th October, Jenni 28th October, Beryl 28th October, Harassed Pete 6th November, Mark 7th November, Mandy Thomson 17th November, Ko Malik 30th November, Chris 1st December, Beryl 2nd December, Alun Owen 19th December, Maz 23rd January, Claire 21st February, The Landlord 21st February, Beryl 12th March, Please leave a comment Landlord Insurance Quotes Complete a quick form and receive amazing deals for Landlord Building Insurance!

Free Landlord Guide Complete guide for new landlords, covering A-Z, no nonsense! This project started days ago. Landlord's Fav's Finding tenants How To Advertise Your Rental On Rightmove List Of Online Letting Agents Selling your property List Of Online Estate Agents How To Privately Sell Your House On Rightmove Online Vs High-street Estate Agent Price Comparison Calculator Landlord life How To Become A Landlord 15 Reasons Why Estate Agents Are Idiots Reasons Why I Hate My Tenant I'm Evicting My Tenant Finance Interest Rate Graph Mortgage Overpayment Calculator Rental Yield Calculator Landlord Software Reviews.

Important It's important you understand that this is a personal blog, and the aim is to provide the best guides, tips, tools and techniques to being a Landlord gathered by personal experience, so the information is NOT guaranteed to be perfect, and should be used as legal or financial guidance, so do note you use the information at your own risk and I can't accept liability if things go wrong.

Please use the links below for more information: